Training Effect = Work x Recovery:
"The reality is that training effect is not built from a single workout, but rather a combination of the weeks prior."
In Lisa language, here's what that means:
Training effect is the result we see from our workouts. To see results, we must have a balance of work to recovery. Too much work with too little recovery yields maintenance
with no change. For some people, the problem with no results, is a lack of recovery to match workouts. We have a lot to learn about what "recovery" means.
Here is a link to Training Effect through an intentional balance of work and recovery:
THE SHORT VERSION
My favorite points:
- The workout (W) and Recovery (R) need to balance out. For every 1 unit of work, there needs to be 1 unit of recovery. When this is in balance, we may achieve Training Effect.
- Recovery is essential. We know this already, but we have a lot to learn about what "recovery" means. Recovery is more than just resting a little between workouts.
- There is a way to take the guess work out of recovery and use this formula to combine recovery efforts that balance out work effort so that we can realize gains.
- Recovery is more than taking a day off. Recovery is the management of workout intensities combined with intentional strategies to offset the overload to the body.
- Training Effect can be achieved within a time period (periodization) rather than within a day. Look within a time period (for most - an easy way to periodize is to create workouts and recoveries within a week, although athletes training for events usually have weeks or even months in their periodization)
- Below, is a detailed table with point values to use to combine and create a recovery value to equal your workout intensity. Recovery activities are given values. Values can be combined to equal a total to offset the unit of work.
- It’s an easy trap for many of us to get stuck in. We all go to the gym and train expecting to see improvement. But with five hours sleep per night, poor diet, and no other recovery strategies in place, you won’t see much, if any improvement. So most people try coming more often or working harder. But the real trick to improving is not to add more work but to beef up other half of the equation and add more recovery.

So the short version: workout 1 hour and add points to equal 1.0 for recovery activities. Simple. If this sounds too good to be true... Find more information in the "Longer Version" section :)
My opinion:
- Yoga falls in the category of "targeted range of motion work." However, they fail to clarify that all yoga is not the same, so questions remain. Certainly, YIN restorative yoga meets this requirement, however, it is my opinion, that many of the other yoga classes do as well. I believe it depends on heat, intensity, and fitness level. To clarify: a novice or "regular" workout person might get an incredible muscular workout from a Hot Vinyasa Power Flow class. True. But also true- intense, highly trained elite athletes will not necessarily get the same workout from a yoga class that they get on a bike, the pool or running. The results of yoga depend heavily on the class, the conditions, and the athlete. For some- yoga would meet the criteria of "targeted range of motion work" to offset "Work" in the equation. For others, Yoga would count in the equation as WORK. Not all yoga is the same. Yoga varies greatly from teacher to teacher with style, intensity, and objective. Heat is also a HUGE factor. Without heat, the stress on the body is greatly reduced for most participants. As with anything, this also matters: What are you putting in to the class? So to recap: It is my opinion, that YOGA can count in the equation on either side- as work or as recovery depending on many factors. It is my recommendation that you should count YOGA in the equation. Just spend a little time deciding if the yoga you are practicing is WORK that stresses the body or if the effect of the YOGA you are practicing counts as targeted range of motion work. Where YOGA fits in the equation is likely to change from class to class and week to week....as it should.
THE LONGER VERSION
My thoughts on the article and favorite points:
So what is training effect? Simply put - gains. The realization that all of our efforts are being realized. Sadly, too many people go to the gym day in and day out, work hard, fail to connect the importance of recovery, see little results other than maintenance, and then believe they need to manipulate the "Work" part of the equation, either by working out harder or more often. The key to seeing a training effect is to balance the equation, and for many, that means more recovery.
To be clear, the information in the links applies to training. For some, the gym is about weight loss, weight maintenance, feeling good and general movement. There is nothing wrong with that. For others, the idea of functional fitness is being able to "DO WORK." When I say "do work" it is in terms, for example, such as: run marathons, lift more weight to build muscle-recruit and build fibers, look a certain way, elevate and maintain a working heart rate in a certain zone, cycle with specific watts goals, cadence objectives, or miles per hours goals...Measurable goals for power, production, or accomplishment. For these types of goals, the formula of training effect is especially important! The balance of work to recovery must be managed in order to see training effect. If this information applies to training, then is it also applicable for those who are maintaining and wanting to feel good? I believe that it does to a large degree. Recovery applies to all of us.
Important points from the article:
Here is to working harder AND smarter!
Here's to our optimal health,
Lisa
Important points from the article:
- This still isn’t the full picture of the training effect equation. This depicts only how to adapt to the training load and assumes that all sessions are equal. It also assumes that each session only takes you to the limit of your current ability. A workout that equals 70% of your current ability only needs an R value of 0.7 to recover from. This is why cycling intensity and volume throughout the week become so important. The reality of most people’s lives is that they will never attain a full R score of 1.0 on a given day. It’s just unrealistic.
- But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do these sessions, as they absolutely serve a purpose. A workout that has a W score of 1.1 or 1.2 is incredibly helpful to take you to the next level. But actually reaching that next level mandates that you follow those hard sessions with ample recovery.
- The reality is that training effect is not built from a single workout, but rather a combination of the weeks prior. The benefit of that reality is that you can essentially stockpile some of your R points to help you recover from these occasional very hard bursts. By having more light and medium days (scores of 0.6-0.8) you can save up some of your recovery and end up with a slight surplus to help you overcome the harder workouts (0.85+)
- "[M]editation and other internal martial arts practice, such as qi gong, have actually been found to nearly double the results of all the other factors on the table except for sleep."
- But what happens if a person can get an average score of 0.85 daily over the course of the month? This is the person who does get eight hours sleep each night, eats clean, and manages to remind him- or herself to foam roll daily. (This is an atypical person, by the way, and should be applauded for this effort.)
- If you make the average level of effort, T, slightly less than equal to 0.85 over the month period, then you will fully recover. A score of 0.85 would have you rested, but not rested enough to see fitness improvements. You could do that by modulating the effort level of each workout as follows:
- Workout 1: 1.0 (or 100%)
- Workout 2: 0.6
- Workout 3: 0.8
- Workout 4: 0.7
- Workout 5: 0.85
- Following this sort of pattern gives an average intensity of 0.8 - just enough recovery ability left to see a marginal improvement over the month. And this is the hard thing for many people to get their head around - you don’t need more training, you need more recovery. If, for whatever reason, your recovery begins to drop because of work, school, family stress, or illness, then your training effect will be changed negatively. It’s an easy trap for many of us to get stuck in. We all go to the gym and train expecting to see improvement. But with five hours sleep per night, poor diet, and no other recovery strategies in place, you won’t see much, if any improvement. So most people try coming more often or working harder. But the real trick to improving is not to add more work but to beef up other half of the equation and add more recovery.
- Always follow your hardest session with your easiest.
- If you add work to your week in order to speed up the process, don’t add in more hard work. Instead add in easier sessions of 0.6-0.7, as these leave plenty of recovery ability and leave surplus to help you recover from the harder sessions that may have a T score of 1.0 or more.
- It is your average workload and recovery over time that matter, not a single session or night’s sleep.
- For best results, keep your average workload somewhere between 0.7-0.8. This should put you in a recovery surplus over time and allow for adaptation. Don’t try to out train your recovery ability.
Further Reading:
- How Your Recovery Relates Directly to Your Performance
- How Much Recovery Do You Need? 7 Factors to Add Up
- Repeat After Me: There Is No Such Thing as Overtraining
- New on Breaking Muscle Today
Here is to working harder AND smarter!
Here's to our optimal health,
Lisa